The math of social science proves that social efficiency can obtain from social equity--the standard that we expect--or from bribing people not to violate our rights. [Coase's Theorem].
Bribes are often legal fees, where attorneys are paid to protest the abuses of rights from prosecutors, law enforcement and judges. There is not much money for lawyers in a system with speedy, inexpensive justice.
As a result, the perps realize the penalties for their egregious abuses will be small, and maybe they will have a minor sentence before being deported. Of course, when there was a death penalty that would be expeditiously applied, these crimes didn't make sense.
Using models of externalities, which Coase's Theorem shows can resolve in private markets, one sees that social efficiency that is also socially equitable implies "do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Concurrently, forcing social efficiency without social equity is "do as they say, but not as they do", which Jesus refers to as hypocrites.
Countries founded, defended and governed by Christians (of European descent) believe in the golden rule, but also believe in violence against those who are hypocrites. These perps are not Christians, do not follow the golden rule, and therefore are at war with Christian society.
There is no such thing as diversity. It was a lie created by minorities to unroot Christians from power in Christian countries. Professor Claudine Gay--who should have been removed from Harvard Presidency--researched 'descriptive representation' because people form cohorts or cliches or religious orders with the intent of reigning supreme.
Because these people were allowed into Britain to force down wages of British lower-skilled labour, and because their large number of voters then gave them political power that was pandered to, they are a gang out of control and will not acquiesce to any authority except their own zealots.
Even the medieval British knew enough to dig moats, fill them with water, and pull up the drawbridges.
Mr. Green admits: "It eventually produced convictions in 2010, 2011... And there were more convictions in a handful of places and local inquiries in three or four towns. And the numbers of estimated victims, just of the handful of men who had been convicted was over 1,000 in each of these small towns" Isn't this evidence that the system worked, and that government eventually did its job?
Sadly, similar things are happening along the 101 freeway corridor here in Southern California. This essay is necessary to understand. Thanks.
This was an excellent article illustrating the mismanagement of immigrants in Europe, and the conspiracy of silence surrounding it. Well said, Dany!
The math of social science proves that social efficiency can obtain from social equity--the standard that we expect--or from bribing people not to violate our rights. [Coase's Theorem].
Bribes are often legal fees, where attorneys are paid to protest the abuses of rights from prosecutors, law enforcement and judges. There is not much money for lawyers in a system with speedy, inexpensive justice.
As a result, the perps realize the penalties for their egregious abuses will be small, and maybe they will have a minor sentence before being deported. Of course, when there was a death penalty that would be expeditiously applied, these crimes didn't make sense.
Using models of externalities, which Coase's Theorem shows can resolve in private markets, one sees that social efficiency that is also socially equitable implies "do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Concurrently, forcing social efficiency without social equity is "do as they say, but not as they do", which Jesus refers to as hypocrites.
Countries founded, defended and governed by Christians (of European descent) believe in the golden rule, but also believe in violence against those who are hypocrites. These perps are not Christians, do not follow the golden rule, and therefore are at war with Christian society.
There is no such thing as diversity. It was a lie created by minorities to unroot Christians from power in Christian countries. Professor Claudine Gay--who should have been removed from Harvard Presidency--researched 'descriptive representation' because people form cohorts or cliches or religious orders with the intent of reigning supreme.
Because these people were allowed into Britain to force down wages of British lower-skilled labour, and because their large number of voters then gave them political power that was pandered to, they are a gang out of control and will not acquiesce to any authority except their own zealots.
Even the medieval British knew enough to dig moats, fill them with water, and pull up the drawbridges.
Mr. Green admits: "It eventually produced convictions in 2010, 2011... And there were more convictions in a handful of places and local inquiries in three or four towns. And the numbers of estimated victims, just of the handful of men who had been convicted was over 1,000 in each of these small towns" Isn't this evidence that the system worked, and that government eventually did its job?